01
Explain before impressing
A useful decision should make sense without a lesson in jargon or an appeal to authority.
About Leeca / Ownership
One accountable person. No unnecessary layers.
Leeca works with businesses that depend on technology but have nobody responsible for the whole picture. The work combines technical judgement, security and an understanding of what it takes to keep a business running.
Small by design. Clear about scope, limits and responsibility.
Why it exists
Too many important decisions fall between suppliers.
An agency can deliver a website. A supplier installs devices. A tool produces alerts. The gap appears when nobody decides what comes first, checks that the pieces fit or keeps the full picture in view.
Leeca takes responsibility for that gap. It can deliver a defined project or own an ongoing area of work, with security included from the start and without turning every conversation into a list of technologies.
Who is behind it
Álvaro Diago de Aguilar
Founder · Software engineer and cybersecurity professional
Álvaro has worked across development, systems, vulnerability management, offensive security and engineering. That experience connects technical decisions to operational consequences, explains risk without drama and supports the work that follows a recommendation.
This professional history belongs to Álvaro. Leeca does not present clients, projects or results from previous employers as its own work.
See Álvaro's independent professional profile(opens in a new tab)How Leeca behaves
Trust starts with a precise account of what Leeca can do.
02
Resolve, not merely recommend
Where scope allows, Leeca delivers, checks and documents. A list of improvements without an owner rarely changes anything.
03
Proportionate security
Controls respond to the risk and the business. Leeca does not sell fear or promise absolute security.
04
Client control
Accounts, documentation and decisions should remain accessible to the business, including when the relationship ends.
Working with Leeca
You will speak to the person who studies the problem.
That reduces translation, avoids promises that are hard to deliver and lets the work fit the actual problem instead of copying a large consultancy process.